TERMINATED UPLAND POLICE OFFICER REINSTATED

By Saku E. Ethir
LACKIE & DAMMEIER

Police Officer Jeffrey Stanley was terminated from the Upland Police Department on July 29, 2004.  At the time of his termination, Stanley had been a police officer with the City of Upland for approximately four years.  Stanley was terminated after an internal affairs investigation was conducted, and resulted in sustained Upland Police Department policy violations of Dishonesty, Conduct Unbecoming an Officer, Respect and Respect for Superiors.  The investigation and sustained charges stemmed from statements made by Stanley, following an attempt by Stanley to lateral to a local police department.  

In early 2004, Stanley applied to the local police agency.  At the conclusion of the application process, Stanley learned, from a source at the lateral agency, that a supervisor at the Upland Police Department had made a negative comment about him to background investigators, which resulted in him being disqualified as a candidate.  Stanley, upon inquiries from other employees at Upland, shared this information with them.  

Stanley was subsequently approached by two of his superiors and interrogated about the above information.  Stanley advised the supervisors of the information he had been provided, by his source, at the lateral agency.  The then Chief of Police, Martin E. Thouvenell, terminated Stanley for the above charges (the most serious being dishonesty), essentially finding that no supervisor at Upland had made a negative comment about Stanley to the lateral agency, thus Stanley had made up that information and lied. 

Stanley, represented by Lackie & Dammeier, appealed his termination under the applicable rules and regulations.  Numerous days of hearing were anticipated due to the involvement of another police department, as well as the sensitive rules surrounding the confidentiality of background investigations conducted by police departments.   Day one began with opening statements and concluded with numerous City/Department witnesses.  Day two was to be more of the same, but was also expected to include testimony from witnesses from the lateral police agency.  

At the start of Day two Stanley and his attorney were approached by the City, and their counsel, and informed that the City had just learned, from the lateral agency and documents in the lateral agency’s possession, that a negative comment had in fact been made by an Upland supervisor, about Stanley, to background investigators.  The City conceded that Stanley had not been dishonest.  As a result of the new information, the City requested, and was granted, a continuance by the presiding arbitrator, to re-evaluate their case.  Soon thereafter, the City, and newly appointed Chief of Police Steve Adams, advised Stanley that the City had dropped all of the charges against Stanley.  This can be viewed as an example of a Chief of Police doing the right thing, and admitting when a wrong has been committed, in this case, by the prior Chief.  

Stanley has since been reinstated to his position of police officer with the Upland Police Department, and has been made whole in the form of wages and benefits.  This was a very difficult time and process for Stanley, who thanks his family and LDF for their constant support.


LDF Home Page | News Article Index

  Email Legal Defense Fund

Top of Page

Copyright © 2000 by Legal Defense Fund